tribulations of the love song of J Alfred Prufrock.....
#5 by omar_r_quraishi on May 21, 2004 5:31am PT
this is pure unadulterated crap -- i suppose though to praise something like this would be considered quite fashionable however
[Reply to interact #5]
#7 by temporal on May 21, 2004 6:46am PT
omar:
coming from you (or any reader)this is acceptable: this is pure unadulterated crap...
--in this interactive medium anyone can express his/her personal opinion...
but this is not: -- i suppose though to praise something like this would be considered quite fashionable however...
--this is blatant and unwanted editorial intrusion;)
(i take back above if you understand the prelude to the love song of j alfred prufrock in its original format)
rgds,
t
ps: the word 'editorial' is being used figuratively - no personal aspersions
#18 by omar_r_quraishi on May 24, 2004 10:39am PT
haha temporal -- sorry havent heard that song -- shandana -- btw u havent responded to my emails -- so i ask u here -- have ya got the check or not we sent?
#19 by temporal on May 25, 2004 8:52am PT
omar:
...let us see if i can put this delicately to you...oh never mind!...instead have a good day sir
...t
#20 by omar_r_quraishi on May 26, 2004 1:08am PT
temporal ??? -- this isnt your ilog sir -- so u will have to be a little less abstruse if you want me to understand what your talking about
#21 by temporal on May 26, 2004 6:05am PTomar:
...t.s. eliot sir...t.s. eliot!
...buried in the i-logs i accidentally dug up where he got the 'song' in alfred j prufrock...(from a short story by rudyard kipling)...the poem is not a song...the prelude to it is in latin...
...i apologise for a bad joke gone awry...
rgds,
t#24 by omar_r_quraishi on May 28, 2004 1:26pm PT
sorry temporal sahib -- dont really get the time to do any outside reading these days --
[Reply to interact #24]
this is pure unadulterated crap -- i suppose though to praise something like this would be considered quite fashionable however
[Reply to interact #5]
#7 by temporal on May 21, 2004 6:46am PT
omar:
coming from you (or any reader)this is acceptable: this is pure unadulterated crap...
--in this interactive medium anyone can express his/her personal opinion...
but this is not: -- i suppose though to praise something like this would be considered quite fashionable however...
--this is blatant and unwanted editorial intrusion;)
(i take back above if you understand the prelude to the love song of j alfred prufrock in its original format)
rgds,
t
ps: the word 'editorial' is being used figuratively - no personal aspersions
#18 by omar_r_quraishi on May 24, 2004 10:39am PT
haha temporal -- sorry havent heard that song -- shandana -- btw u havent responded to my emails -- so i ask u here -- have ya got the check or not we sent?
#19 by temporal on May 25, 2004 8:52am PT
omar:
...let us see if i can put this delicately to you...oh never mind!...instead have a good day sir
...t
#20 by omar_r_quraishi on May 26, 2004 1:08am PT
temporal ??? -- this isnt your ilog sir -- so u will have to be a little less abstruse if you want me to understand what your talking about
#21 by temporal on May 26, 2004 6:05am PTomar:
...t.s. eliot sir...t.s. eliot!
...buried in the i-logs i accidentally dug up where he got the 'song' in alfred j prufrock...(from a short story by rudyard kipling)...the poem is not a song...the prelude to it is in latin...
...i apologise for a bad joke gone awry...
rgds,
t#24 by omar_r_quraishi on May 28, 2004 1:26pm PT
sorry temporal sahib -- dont really get the time to do any outside reading these days --
[Reply to interact #24]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home